application/x-www-form-urlencoded or multipart/form-data?
#1
I've been working with API POST requests and I'm trying to decide whether to use application/x-www-form-urlencoded or multipart/form-data in a non-browser, API client context. While it's generally understood that multipart/form-data is necessary for file uploads in browsers, in an API setting the distinction isn't always as clear.
For example, if I'm just sending simple key-value pairs, it seems that application/x-www-form-urlencoded is the go-to. However, if the data includes non-ASCII characters or is binary data, multipart/form-data is suitable.

Code:
}
response = requests.post(url, headers = headers, data = payload)
return response

On the other hand, when I'm dealing with file uploads or need to combine text and binary data, multipart/form-data seems to be the right choice.


Can anyone shed some more light on this topic or share best practices for choosing between the two?
Reply
#2
Certainly, when working with APIs, it's important to consider overhead. The multipart/form-data type introduces a lot of overhead compared to application/x-www-form-urlencoded because it needs to include mime type and boundaries. This adds to the size of the request, which can impact performance.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)